Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Morality & Ethics >> RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us?
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 3:54:05 PM   
doinkdom


Posts: 4319
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: The higher lowcountry
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: manda59
quote:

ORIGINAL: rcjames
That is the one of the reasons for caging; so that the animals are not crammed together and aid in the spread of infection and disease.

I don't know what cages you have other there, but here in the UK battery cages are not even big enough for the chicken to turn around, or stand up straight. And the next chicken's cage is right next to it. Not physically touching, but definitely close enough for the spread of infection/disease.

Those are the ones I've seen over here and those free-range pig picturs are too cute. We have friends up in Indiana with a pig farm and it always smells like alfafa...really clean cause they give the pigs some room to move about.

_____________________________


Cool drinks served daily at Oasis
http://oasisgc.wordpress.com/
My Blog: http://peacemakingirl.wordpress.com/
Post #: 76
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 4:15:31 PM   
StephK


Posts: 2237
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Southwest Louisiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: manda59

quote:

ORIGINAL: doinkdom
Do you think you'll always keep hens around your yard? My granny does, even though she's always fussing at them to stop eating her flowers .



Yes, yes and yes! We were without hens for a couple of years a while ago, and even quite apart from not having our own eggs, I so missed having them around the place. I love to watch them scratching and pecking, and running around the place. They actually are quite comical at times too.


My neighbor has chickens and there's one that literally rules the roost. It pecks the daylights out of the three dogs. My dumb yellow lab has had her nose pecked more than once when she stuck her nose through the fence.

_____________________________

Stephanie

The heart of the wise inclines to the right but the heart of the fool to the left.
Even as he walks along the road, the fool lacks sense and shows everyone how stupid he is.
~ Ecc. 10:2-3
Post #: 77
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 4:23:33 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7598
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
While I am no fan of large corporate farms, and while I think it's pleasant to think of farm animals running about the farm a la Charlotte's Web, I think the reality for those who make their living producing food which feeds hundreds of millions of people is that there has to be some aspect whereby one can regularize inputs and outputs, and have systems whereby you can determine and control costs of running a business.

That means feed controls, having the ability to estimate how many animals one can produce, and how much each animal will sell for, how many you can sell, how you can maximize those rates of returns and minimize costs. Treating animals humanely can and should be one of those costs, but there has to be balance, and a realistic determination about whether one can make a living also.

_____________________________

Jack

I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
- C.S. Lewis
Post #: 78
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 4:33:34 PM   
StephK


Posts: 2237
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Southwest Louisiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: manda59

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaleHawkWoman
Pigs cannot be allowed to free-range



Free Range Pigs in Wiltshire, England


Around here free range pigs are a real problem. Since they aren't native all free ranging hogs are considered feral and they are very destructive. Although they do make good bacon.

_____________________________

Stephanie

The heart of the wise inclines to the right but the heart of the fool to the left.
Even as he walks along the road, the fool lacks sense and shows everyone how stupid he is.
~ Ecc. 10:2-3
Post #: 79
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 5:15:33 PM   
rcjames


Posts: 5782
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: manda59
I don't know what cages you have other there, but here in the UK battery cages are not even big enough for the chicken to turn around, or stand up straight. And the next chicken's cage is right next to it. Not physically touching, but definitely close enough for the spread of infection/disease.


i sorta doubt that, but at least they are not walking around in and eating their own poop.

Thanks
RC

_____________________________

Just a country Preacher's humble opinion

Read the first chapter of my latest book here;
http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
Post #: 80
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 5:18:46 PM   
eaglelady11

 

Posts: 337
Joined: 7/20/2005
Status: offline
I buy free range chicken and the salmon I eat is wild salmon since fish raised in captivity swim in their own feces. you also have to look at the health issue of eating foods raised on poorer conditions and stuffed with drugs.

to answer a question on the board, I do not think it abuse to raise animals that we need to eat for our survival even though vegetarianism would provide for our nutritional needs. that's like saying a lion is abusing a sheep when he goes after his food.

we can be more humane in how we treat animals and I definitely believe we will be called into account when we answer to Jesus.

we were created worship.

to answer the original question of free range being better, my answer is yes.
Post #: 81
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 6:15:53 PM   
manda59


Posts: 6187
Joined: 9/22/2005
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rcjames
i sorta doubt that, but at least they are not walking around in and eating their own poop.


Have you ever actually seen battery cages, rcjames?

And, as I said, I've been around chickens a lot these last 23 years, and in all that time have never seen a hen eat its own faeces. Apart from any inbuilt revulsion which I believe it has to its own faeces, why would it need to, with grain, grass, leftovers perhaps and anything else it has around it that is edible?

_____________________________

"Manda is right"
mvic, January 2009
Post #: 82
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 6:33:17 PM   
manda59


Posts: 6187
Joined: 9/22/2005
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline
Here you are, rcjames, some pictures of battery cages:

http://www.animalwritings.com/images/battery-cages-03.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Industrial-Chicken-Coop.JPG

http://img.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/0704/6d3ad3e062d656657267.jpeg

I've seen battery cages that are just for one chicken, but more commonly they hold 4 or 5 chickens.
And yet one chicken's wingspan can measure the same as the width of three battery cages.

_____________________________

"Manda is right"
mvic, January 2009
Post #: 83
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 7:02:06 PM   
Zhi


Posts: 1500
Joined: 7/31/2007
Status: offline
I've actually seen chickens eat their own um, poo, quite a few times while raising them. And this is when they're entirely out of the coop just flapping around doing their usual "I'm a very stupid bird" act. They could have gone after the grasshoppers, or they could have gone into the coop and grabbed a snack out of the feeder, or they could have gone a little further to the wheat field or the hay piles, but apparently they'd rather not. *shrug*

_____________________________

The optimist says the glass is half full. The pessimist says the glass is half empty. The engineer says the glass is twice as large as it needs to be.
Post #: 84
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 7:08:13 PM   
manda59


Posts: 6187
Joined: 9/22/2005
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline
Well I've certainly see them pecking around in other decaying matter, including scratching up cow pats looking for bugs, and it honestly doesn't bother me. I can't imagine it would have any effect on their health in any case. Chickens have pretty strong effective constitutions, and things go through them very quickly indeed.

_____________________________

"Manda is right"
mvic, January 2009
Post #: 85
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 8:26:04 PM   
Zhi


Posts: 1500
Joined: 7/31/2007
Status: offline
The only time I've ever seen a chicken NOT try to eat something, quite frankly, is when my sister accidentally put a cup of baking soda into a batch of cookies that called for a teaspoon of baking soda, and then tried to hide the evidence by feeding it to the chickens. They apparently wouldn't touch the stuff. hee.

_____________________________

The optimist says the glass is half full. The pessimist says the glass is half empty. The engineer says the glass is twice as large as it needs to be.
Post #: 86
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 8:28:11 PM   
WhiteRoseBlessings


Posts: 23494
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Here . . . but subject to change; stay tuned
Status: offline


_____________________________

Post #: 87
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/16/2008 10:47:09 PM   
manda59


Posts: 6187
Joined: 9/22/2005
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline
For agapetos:

http://www.bhwt.org.uk/hen-friendly-products.php

_____________________________

"Manda is right"
mvic, January 2009
Post #: 88
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 12:05:35 AM   
Mrs.X


Posts: 2947
Joined: 7/7/2005
From: Newberg, OR
Status: offline
I went to that link you posted, Manda. How sweet. I looked at the gallery of the "ex-bat girls". LOL

_____________________________

-Stina
From Sweet Grass to the Packin' House
A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger. -Proverbs 15:1
Post #: 89
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 1:44:14 AM   
agapetos


Posts: 5563
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: This side of the lil duck pond!
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mrs.X

I went to that link you posted, Manda. How sweet. I looked at the gallery of the "ex-bat girls". LOL

LOL! As I read the 'For agapetos', I wondered how many others would go to the link. I'm glad that at least one person did!

I went too. It was sweet. Does make you think about what you're buying without thinking doesn't it?

Some of my neighbours and I would love to share the care for some chickens ~ and theirs loads of space for them. The trustees wouldn't go for it though.

I liked the free range pigs link too ~ especially given it's in Wiltshire, the county I live in! Kinda reminded me of 'Jimmy's Farm'.

_____________________________

I could give up chocolate ~ but I'm no quitter!

My blog
Post #: 90
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 8:57:29 AM   
Tinkerbell_


Posts: 8649
Joined: 1/25/2008
From: NeverNeverLand
Status: offline
That was a cute link.

I was sitting here thinking, "Awww...I want my own chickens!" but I don't think my landlord would allow it...nor my neighbours.

_____________________________

Post #: 91
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 10:33:46 AM   
manda59


Posts: 6187
Joined: 9/22/2005
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mrs.X

I went to that link you posted, Manda. How sweet. I looked at the gallery of the "ex-bat girls". LOL



Did you see the hen with the little jacket on?!

_____________________________

"Manda is right"
mvic, January 2009
Post #: 92
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 10:42:50 AM   
ultimathule

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 10/16/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I'm honestly not sure what good that would do.

However, all around where I live, there is an over-population of deer. Obviously this leads to lots of other problems. Maybe we could just sell more deer tags to hunters.


I agree. Or have the farms and let hunters come and shoot them because it seems theres massive population of deer lately. Also, i think it would be easier, cheaper and healthier to raise and consume them. just my opinion, plus i am tired of dodging them in my car.
Post #: 93
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 1:41:43 PM   
Mrs.X


Posts: 2947
Joined: 7/7/2005
From: Newberg, OR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: manda59

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mrs.X

I went to that link you posted, Manda. How sweet. I looked at the gallery of the "ex-bat girls". LOL



Did you see the hen with the little jacket on?!

LOL, yeah....that was cute. Now I wish we could have chickens. Our landlord doesn't allow pets though.

_____________________________

-Stina
From Sweet Grass to the Packin' House
A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger. -Proverbs 15:1
Post #: 94
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 3:24:56 PM   
rcjames


Posts: 5782
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: eaglelady11

I buy free range chicken and the salmon I eat is wild salmon since fish raised in captivity swim in their own feces. you also have to look at the health issue of eating foods raised on poorer conditions and stuffed with drugs.


And you are assuming that there is no feces in the water of wild salmon????

Thanks
RC

_____________________________

Just a country Preacher's humble opinion

Read the first chapter of my latest book here;
http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
Post #: 95
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 6:00:24 PM   
Sideways


Posts: 3944
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rcjames

quote:

ORIGINAL: eaglelady11

I buy free range chicken and the salmon I eat is wild salmon since fish raised in captivity swim in their own feces. you also have to look at the health issue of eating foods raised on poorer conditions and stuffed with drugs.


And you are assuming that there is no feces in the water of wild salmon????


Far, far more diluted, hardly even comparable.

_____________________________

This warranty does not include shark bites, bear attacks and children under five.
Post #: 96
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 7:35:39 PM   
manda59


Posts: 6187
Joined: 9/22/2005
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rcjames
And you are assuming that there is no feces in the water of wild salmon????


You really do seem to have a thing about faeces.

_____________________________

"Manda is right"
mvic, January 2009
Post #: 97
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 9:49:35 PM   
PaleHawkWoman

 

Posts: 645
Joined: 7/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: manda59

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaleHawkWoman
Pigs cannot be allowed to free-range



Free Range Pigs in Wiltshire, England


So they let these pigs roam all over the countryside? Or are they confined to the property of the owners? How are they handled, especially the sows with pigs? Here in the South there are feral pigs in may rural areas, like the Razorbacks of the Ozarks, descended from "free-range" pigs gone wild and they are very dangerous. The "Hogzilla" of a couple of years back is another example of feral pigs. Most pigs will root under fences and even stock fencing willnot keep them in unless the bottom is reinforced with barbed-wire and logs that the fence has been nailed to. We also put large rocks around the fence on the outside to further reinforce the fence. The pigs constantly rooted around the base of the fence. One sow actually got out, and we had a heck of a time getting her back in. She bit at my grandfather and laid a gash in his leg,then turned on me. I climbed up a tree faster than you could imagine. It took the dogs to get her in and she tried to get them too. It must be said that this sow was nasty-tempered to start with.

I had a pet pig and used to let her out to graze in the pasture, but as a pet she was trained to respond to commands.
Post #: 98
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/17/2008 10:48:42 PM   
abraxas

 

Posts: 333
Joined: 4/8/2008
Status: offline
I became a vegetarian for humanitarian reasons, but since then I've learned more about the health and environmental issues surrounding our meat industries and it really drives it home. How much farmland is used just to feed livestock, how much water is needed to produce beef and pork, how incredibly polluting it all is, etc. etc.

This is a ted.com speech that lays it out very well, I highly recommend having a look. (also highly recommend ted.com) If you aren't sold on the global warming issue, don't worry that isn't his main thrust, just some opening comments.

what's wrong with what we eat?
Post #: 99
RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us? - 10/18/2008 2:57:20 AM   
miasma


Posts: 4120
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
Free range is, of course, across a variety of angles, better for us. How is that even a question?

Win-win situation.
Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Morality & Ethics >> RE: Is "Free Range" better or worse for us?
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out |