|
moon_mouse -> RE: She wore what? Opinions on those in leadership positions. (9/25/2008 1:44:06 PM)
|
First, it's important to look at the purpose of the website and who produces it, and take that into account in how much credence you give to what it says. There seems to be a thread in current Christianity that sees pagan influence in just about everything. These Christians unfortunately often mistake cosmetic similarity for origin. Any child drawing stars might eventually stumble upon the discovery that two triangles drawn on top of one another create a star. Just because it happens to look like the Star of David doesn't mean they're secretly Jewish. I'm not saying that there isn't some possible connection between Nero's cross and the Peace Symbol, just that the preponderance of the evidence in websites dedicated to history indicates the semaphore origin. Second, if one wants to find information about the peace symbol, it makes more sense to use "peace symbol" as the search item, rather than "Nero's cross". Using "Nero's cross" as the search term would tend to give high visibility to sites that attribute the peace symbol to that origin and place sites that mention the proposed connection and then discard/discredit it further down the search results. Using "peace symbol" as your search term doesn't lead to that preselection, and would not be likely to prejudice against sites that mention in a positive manner the Nero's cross connection. Interestingly, I have been listening to a UC Berkley podcast series of a class on the Roman Empire. New scholarship is taking a fresh look at Nero and the persecution of Christians. While it is certain that Christians were persecuted under Nero, some scholars now believe that the scale of the actual persecution was exaggerated by later Christians for their own purposes. (Of course any persecution of anyone for their religious beliefs is horrible.) This article makes some of the same points the prof did. http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/3678/Nero.htm It's still a controversial thesis, but an interesting one!
|
|
|
|