Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 2:26:17 PM   
iwillfearnoevil


Posts: 4461
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: upstate NY
Status: online
why does no liberal democrat want to comment on obama's OTHER gender stereotypes when campainging against women: kitchen sink, claws out, periodically feeling down, sweeties references, jay-z motions?

_____________________________

Photoblogging My Life
Post #: 176
RE: From an onlooker... - 9/11/2008 2:29:31 PM   
adelphi_sky

 

Posts: 403
Joined: 10/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Longfingers1

I've been a visitor to this forum for a little over a month now (have been visiting the site for bible commentaries and to view the bible online when needed for years). I am saddened by what I have seen in this forum about the election. Here I've seen my brothers and sisters in Christ say such nasty things about others, questioning people's devotion to their faith because they differ on views (or just out right saying you can't be a Christian if you think or believe in whatever issues) , and ect., and it all is sad. I'm a political junkie but I also like to see what other people of different political parties, race, faith are saying about the election, and to my surprise I see such things that aren't of God being said in of all places a Christian forum. I couldn't hold my peace though after reading some of my fellow Christians comments.

I'm a very open-minded person and with this election, I haven't been anything less. I listen to the speeches, commentaries, have read thoroughly about the candidates platforms to know what they're running on, so I'd like to think I'm informed as well. I personally don't think politics should be as dirty as it is, but what was spun out of the republican campaign was a new low. I've heard the now infamous speech numerous times now in its entirety to see that what was said wasn't what it's been made out to be (like many of you have also said). It's a common term that's used from congressman to your everyday person, so common enough it's been used by many politicians, including McCain himself more than a few times in this election campaign alone (at times used when talking about Hillary's healthcare plan... to the poster who said this is the first time Obama has made this comment so he must have been referencing Palin, we have a vast amount of information to us unlike so many other elections where we can find out for ourselves the truth and not make up our own conclusions or whatever the case may be, but if searched, you would see Obama use the lipstick phrase in refrence to Bush in Washington Post intervew last year). However people have run with this to the point where they're asking for Obama to apologize; it's a low form of politics. Many say you have to be dirty when playing politics, but when mud is slung at someone (which in this election seems so be thrown alot at a particular candidate), they're in a catch 22 situation, if they don't speak up about something, then they're hiding from it and if they do, then they're whining about or being mean; but when the shoe is on the other foot, all those rules go out the window... it's total hypocrisy.

Here we have two candidates who are both good people at heart, and could set a standard by dismissing the dirty tactics. Instead there's mean-spirited and inaccuarte ads putting down the other, alot of sladering and mud slinging, and I really thought Americans have had enough of this... but this this whole lipstick story becomes headlines news all day yesterday... what a distraction from the issues that I would like to hear from both parties, out of their own mouths. I'm not for one party over the other, but I just think that some people here should be mindful that though people may not post here, they may read what's written like myself. You may have those who aren't saved are in search of Christ visitng the site and then upon further exploration, find this forum about the election, and what kind of message is that sending out with some of the mean spirited thread titles and comments being written. I'm all for listening to others, discussing issues, but I think it can be done without being so mean and judging someone's faith constantly.



Best thing I've heard all year. I've come here myself for a while. But have been disappointed in the biased and total disregard for truth that I've been turned off. It's gotten to the point to where I am deeply concerned about where the focus of Christianity has gone. We should not be taking cues from secular sources, but from God Himself and it seems that we have thrown compassion, reason, understanding, and logic completely out the window. We've now succumbed to being spoonfed lies, deceit, judgement, and guile because we're too lazy to search for truth and reason on our own. No one knows a man's heart. In this election, juedge, lest ye be judged accordingly. Political debate can be healthy and enlightening, but things have gone too far.
Post #: 177
RE: From an onlooker... - 9/11/2008 2:31:21 PM   
iwillfearnoevil


Posts: 4461
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: upstate NY
Status: online
especially when the trolls come in, it just turns any conversation sour. and if you don't think there are trolls here, just look at the number of people with no posting history or a few months ago when all the rpaul spam was hitting the net including cw.

_____________________________

Photoblogging My Life
Post #: 178
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 2:46:59 PM   
huangshan

 

Posts: 869
Joined: 8/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: iwillfearnoevil

why does no liberal democrat want to comment on obama's OTHER gender stereotypes when campainging against women: kitchen sink, claws out, periodically feeling down, sweeties references, jay-z motions?


I'm not sure. Maybe because most of them are trumped-up or irrelevant. In the case of "brush the dirt off your shoulder", for example, I have a hard time seeing how that's a sleight against women. In fact, it seems like an absurdly tenuous connection.

What's with all the PC hand wringing coming from your side?
Post #: 179
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 2:53:42 PM   
huangshan

 

Posts: 869
Joined: 8/6/2008
Status: offline
Actually, upon reflection, if you seriously think that Obama "brushing the dirt off his shoulder" is misogynistic, I wholly understand where this absurd outrage over the lipstick pig comment is coming from. I confess, I was not aware that people could be so creative in finding ways to be offended. It's very much like the six degrees of Kevin Bacon.
Post #: 180
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 2:59:00 PM   
SwedishCovenant

 

Posts: 606
Joined: 8/8/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: huangshan

Actually, upon reflection, if you seriously think that Obama "brushing the dirt off his shoulder" is misogynistic, I wholly understand where this absurd outrage over the lipstick pig comment is coming from. I confess, I was not aware that people could be so creative in finding ways to be offended. It's very much like the six degrees of Kevin Bacon.


Feigned outrage is all the McPalin people have to work with.

You'll note that they aren't talking up McCain's "95% of George Bush's Failures" very much these days.
Post #: 181
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 4:09:41 PM   
iwillfearnoevil


Posts: 4461
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: upstate NY
Status: online
i thought a large part of obama's appeal was because he was hip and cool. we know he has jay-z on his ipod, his music is played at campaign events (altho i doubt candidates micromanage to this level). maureen dowd hardly a mccain supporter or republican even wrote about obama's gesture months ago before any republicans brought it up:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/opinion/20dowd.html

what now guys? you make false claims about who is running mccain's campaign that is easily fact checked? think republicans are stretching it with the jay-z reference when it was actually picked up and promoted by liberals? come on, give some real arguments instead of copying and pasting liberal talking points. do some research and think on your own. of course you can just repeat what the one says ...

_____________________________

Photoblogging My Life
Post #: 182
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 4:17:03 PM   
letusreason


Posts: 869
Joined: 8/30/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: adelphi_sky



Even AFTER it's been PROVEN in print and on VIDEO that McCain used the EXACT same "lipstick on a pig" phrase, it baffles me that people still accuse Obama as being sexist. You can't have it both ways.


wow, yet another that can't differentiate the context of McCain's lipstick phrase on a healhcare policy and Obama's personal (sexist) attack. Funny how the democrat blogs lit up with "palin as a pig" and everywhere else Obama didn't mean that.
Obama is immaturely tone deaf and his schoolyard speech betrays him.
Post #: 183
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 4:18:20 PM   
letusreason


Posts: 869
Joined: 8/30/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SwedishCovenant

quote:

ORIGINAL: huangshan

Actually, upon reflection, if you seriously think that Obama "brushing the dirt off his shoulder" is misogynistic, I wholly understand where this absurd outrage over the lipstick pig comment is coming from. I confess, I was not aware that people could be so creative in finding ways to be offended. It's very much like the six degrees of Kevin Bacon.


Feigned outrage is all the McPalin people have to work with.

You'll note that they aren't talking up McCain's "95% of George Bush's Failures" very much these days.


And democratic bloggers callin Palin a pig is what Obama has voting for him.

Bush 7
Terrorists 0
Post #: 184
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 4:27:55 PM   
SwedishCovenant

 

Posts: 606
Joined: 8/8/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: letusreason

quote:

ORIGINAL: SwedishCovenant

quote:

ORIGINAL: huangshan

Actually, upon reflection, if you seriously think that Obama "brushing the dirt off his shoulder" is misogynistic, I wholly understand where this absurd outrage over the lipstick pig comment is coming from. I confess, I was not aware that people could be so creative in finding ways to be offended. It's very much like the six degrees of Kevin Bacon.


Feigned outrage is all the McPalin people have to work with.

You'll note that they aren't talking up McCain's "95% of George Bush's Failures" very much these days.


And democratic bloggers callin Palin a pig is what Obama has voting for him.

Bush 7
Terrorists 0


Wow, way to dismiss and attempt to marginalize 50% of your fellow countrymen.

Want to know why America is on the ropes? It's because of the balkanization of the electorate, begun by Republicans to get elected because they know they can't cross ideologic boundaries with the nonsense they offer.
Post #: 185
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 4:41:01 PM   
stamper_ben


Posts: 10366
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lone Star State
Status: offline
America is on the ropes? Explain that please, in a little more than the generalities as you did.

_____________________________

We will be known as His by the love we show one another.
Post #: 186
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 4:53:03 PM   
davemiller7


Posts: 1085
Joined: 3/5/2008
From: NC via NY
Status: offline
Yes, that will be interesting to hear, but don't expect anything more than a bunch of Democrat talking points and then a big "checkmate."

-Dave

quote:

ORIGINAL: stamper_ben

America is on the ropes? Explain that please, in a little more than the generalities as you did.


_____________________________

-Dave

The Prayer of Protection
The light of God surrounds me,
The love of God enfolds me,
The power of God protects me,
The presence of God watches over me.
Wherever I am, God is.
Post #: 187
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 5:20:48 PM   
relady

 

Posts: 1212
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Greater St. Louis Metro
Status: offline
quote:

He's been going after Palin since the convention.
What planet are you on? How specifically has Obama gone after Palin. I've heard him say nothing except to repeat what the issues are and ask the McCain campaign to respond to the issues. Which they haven't. They can't because they are just more of the same we've come to hate over the past 8 years.

quote:

karl rove is not working for the campaign ...
Perhaps not, but he has a LOT of input. This campaign has all the Karl Rove earmarks...repeat the lie loud enough and often enough and people will believe it. The fact that McCain even allows someone like Rove to be involved on any level tells me all I need to know -- and that is that I don't need him running my country.
Post #: 188
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 5:29:39 PM   
iwillfearnoevil


Posts: 4461
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: upstate NY
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: relady
Perhaps not, but he has a LOT of input. This campaign has all the Karl Rove earmarks...repeat the lie loud enough and often enough and people will believe it. The fact that McCain even allows someone like Rove to be involved on any level tells me all I need to know -- and that is that I don't need him running my country.


arguments like 'repeat the lie loud enough times ...' can be held for you saying rove is involved ... i posted an article detailing mccain's inner circle including the changes ... and in rebuttal saying rove donated money to mccain and had a private phone call ... can you find other news articles detailing rove's involvement, i am really willing to stand corrected ...

also it is ironic that rove calling mccain once (is it more, i'm not sure) bothers you but obama's slum lord rezko problem and his close associations will bill ayers doesn't both you let alone jeramiah wright ... don't hold double standards ... a presidential advisor (rove) vs known terrorists etc

next argument please ... please try harder libs ... this only took me 30 seconds of brain power ...

_____________________________

Photoblogging My Life
Post #: 189
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 6:13:59 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 5921
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: Northern Califonria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CAHardbarger

I can no longer keep quiet... I am a born-again Christian... who also happens to be a lifelong Democrat and Obama supporter. How dare any of you question my morals, my motives, and my heart! Especially those of you with Scripture verses tagged to the bottom of your notes. What we have here is the Karl-Rovian style of politics that existed in 2004 and it is wrong, regardless of which party is responsible for it. IF - and I say if - Obama deliberately used the phrase as a slam to Palin, he owes her an apology. But, the McCain campaign also owes Obama apologies for many of the untruths they are saying about him. If Obama is indeed the devil that some of you portray him to be, then the TRUTH should be enough to defeat him.... Can we not pray together that we can have political discussions based on truth, the issues, and that we can learn about the character of the individuals who are asking to lead us. Would either of them be worse than the last 8 years? AND, that is all I have to say. REMEMBER, I am a grandmother of five when you decide to slam my character and morals.



Heh... Anyone else get the feeling someone is using their other handle... Which btw isn't against the TOS...

_____________________________

John
Proverbs 12:10 A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.
Post #: 190
RE: From an onlooker... - 9/11/2008 6:17:39 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 5921
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: Northern Califonria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Longfingers1
You may have those who aren't saved are in search of Christ visitng the site and then upon further exploration, find this forum about the election, and what kind of message is that sending out with some of the mean spirited thread titles and comments being written. I'm all for listening to others, discussing issues, but I think it can be done without being so mean and judging someone's faith constantly.



I wonder at times when those in search of Christ think when they see people who support abortion and homosexuality just like they do...

_____________________________

John
Proverbs 12:10 A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.
Post #: 191
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 7:01:26 PM   
CAHardbarger

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline
No, this is my first post. No other alias.
Post #: 192
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 7:02:57 PM   
CAHardbarger

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline
Here you go, questioning my honesty. I have no "other handle," no alias..... this is me and my first post.
Post #: 193
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 7:14:30 PM   
letusreason


Posts: 869
Joined: 8/30/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SwedishCovenant

quote:

ORIGINAL: letusreason

quote:

ORIGINAL: SwedishCovenant

quote:

ORIGINAL: huangshan

Actually, upon reflection, if you seriously think that Obama "brushing the dirt off his shoulder" is misogynistic, I wholly understand where this absurd outrage over the lipstick pig comment is coming from. I confess, I was not aware that people could be so creative in finding ways to be offended. It's very much like the six degrees of Kevin Bacon.


Feigned outrage is all the McPalin people have to work with.

You'll note that they aren't talking up McCain's "95% of George Bush's Failures" very much these days.


And democratic bloggers callin Palin a pig is what Obama has voting for him.

Bush 7
Terrorists 0


Wow, way to dismiss and attempt to marginalize 50% of your fellow countrymen.

Want to know why America is on the ropes? It's because of the balkanization of the electorate, begun by Republicans to get elected because they know they can't cross ideologic boundaries with the nonsense they offer.


I don't believe i mentioned 50% or anything that resembled 50% but if you want to redefine my post it can be your preogative to do so.

And the democrats grasping for power by exploiting the poor and minorities with the nonsense of government tax and spend social programs like the ones that failed under Lyndon Johnson is not a factor? Where's John Stossel when you need him! Give me a break!!
Post #: 194
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 7:16:41 PM   
letusreason


Posts: 869
Joined: 8/30/2008
Status: offline
It's not too far-fetched to say Team Obama is cribbing his stump speech laugh lines from the liberal funnies.

Yes these are the cartoon constituents of Barak Obama the patron saint of the sick and disgusting.
Post #: 195
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 7:53:23 PM   
empyrealsymphony

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 9/10/2008
Status: offline
No one is claiming innocence on the part of Barack Obama. However, the reason John McCain is a hypocrite is also because he allowed a questioner to call Hillary Clinton a "b*tch" and then laughed about it and did nothing against it. If he was so outraged at rude remarks he wouldn't have let it slide.
Post #: 196
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 8:11:39 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 5921
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: Northern Califonria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: empyrealsymphony

No one is claiming innocence on the part of Barack Obama. However, the reason John McCain is a hypocrite is also because he allowed a questioner to call Hillary Clinton a "b*tch" and then laughed about it and did nothing against it. If he was so outraged at rude remarks he wouldn't have let it slide.



Truth is a... Never mind...

_____________________________

John
Proverbs 12:10 A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.
Post #: 197
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 8:13:10 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 5921
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: Northern Califonria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CAHardbarger

No, this is my first post. No other alias.



That would explain your comment about people questioning your morals, motives, and heart before you ever posted...

_____________________________

John
Proverbs 12:10 A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.
Post #: 198
RE: From an onlooker... - 9/11/2008 8:41:00 PM   
henny


Posts: 1169
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:


ORIGINAL: Longfingers1

I've been a visitor to this forum for a little over a month now (have been visiting the site for bible commentaries and to view the bible online when needed for years). I am saddened by what I have seen in this forum about the election. Here I've seen my brothers and sisters in Christ say such nasty things about others, questioning people's devotion to their faith because they differ on views (or just out right saying you can't be a Christian if you think or believe in whatever issues) , and ect., and it all is sad. I'm a political junkie but I also like to see what other people of different political parties, race, faith are saying about the election, and to my surprise I see such things that aren't of God being said in of all places a Christian forum. I couldn't hold my peace though after reading some of my fellow Christians comments.

I'm a very open-minded person and with this election, I haven't been anything less. I listen to the speeches, commentaries, have read thoroughly about the candidates platforms to know what they're running on, so I'd like to think I'm informed as well. I personally don't think politics should be as dirty as it is, but what was spun out of the republican campaign was a new low. I've heard the now infamous speech numerous times now in its entirety to see that what was said wasn't what it's been made out to be (like many of you have also said). It's a common term that's used from congressman to your everyday person, so common enough it's been used by many politicians, including McCain himself more than a few times in this election campaign alone (at times used when talking about Hillary's healthcare plan... to the poster who said this is the first time Obama has made this comment so he must have been referencing Palin, we have a vast amount of information to us unlike so many other elections where we can find out for ourselves the truth and not make up our own conclusions or whatever the case may be, but if searched, you would see Obama use the lipstick phrase in refrence to Bush in Washington Post intervew last year). However people have run with this to the point where they're asking for Obama to apologize; it's a low form of politics. Many say you have to be dirty when playing politics, but when mud is slung at someone (which in this election seems so be thrown alot at a particular candidate), they're in a catch 22 situation, if they don't speak up about something, then they're hiding from it and if they do, then they're whining about or being mean; but when the shoe is on the other foot, all those rules go out the window... it's total hypocrisy.

Here we have two candidates who are both good people at heart, and could set a standard by dismissing the dirty tactics. Instead there's mean-spirited and inaccuarte ads putting down the other, alot of sladering and mud slinging, and I really thought Americans have had enough of this... but this this whole lipstick story becomes headlines news all day yesterday... what a distraction from the issues that I would like to hear from both parties, out of their own mouths. I'm not for one party over the other, but I just think that some people here should be mindful that though people may not post here, they may read what's written like myself. You may have those who aren't saved are in search of Christ visitng the site and then upon further exploration, find this forum about the election, and what kind of message is that sending out with some of the mean spirited thread titles and comments being written. I'm all for listening to others, discussing issues, but I think it can be done without being so mean and judging someone's faith constantly.



Triple Amen to this.

I've stopped posting here lately just because the level of animosity, hypocrisy (on both sides), and childishness completely depresses me. There's such a palpable level of very real hatred seething under the surface here that you can't read anything without getting sucked into it, which is kind of sad given that this is a Christian forum. This is something that comes from both sides as well, and it's not a left/right issue. I'm sick of it and I've realized that I don't gain much of anything from posting here anymore, entertainment wise or information wise, nor is it intellectually stimulating in anyway -it's just childish idiots shouting, faking outrage, and trying to "one up" each other as best as possible (and I've done my share of this as well, so I certainly include myself in this criticism). I think posting here tends to kill more brain cells than it stimulates so I've been thinking of just retiring my account.

_____________________________

Hell is other Christians.
Post #: 199
RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama - 9/11/2008 11:49:03 PM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 1320
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: davemiller7

I'm a grandfather of five, not that has any significance to this. Nor does your claim. Since you have ONE POST, I fail to see how anyone has slammed your character or morals.

By the way, welcome to CW.

-Dave

quote:

ORIGINAL: CAHardbarger

I can no longer keep quiet... I am a born-again Christian... who also happens to be a lifelong Democrat and Obama supporter. How dare any of you question my morals, my motives, and my heart! Especially those of you with Scripture verses tagged to the bottom of your notes. What we have here is the Karl-Rovian style of politics that existed in 2004 and it is wrong, regardless of which party is responsible for it. IF - and I say if - Obama deliberately used the phrase as a slam to Palin, he owes her an apology. But, the McCain campaign also owes Obama apologies for many of the untruths they are saying about him. If Obama is indeed the devil that some of you portray him to be, then the TRUTH should be enough to defeat him.... Can we not pray together that we can have political discussions based on truth, the issues, and that we can learn about the character of the individuals who are asking to lead us. Would either of them be worse than the last 8 years? AND, that is all I have to say. REMEMBER, I am a grandmother of five when you decide to slam my character and morals.



That was a preemptive strike, something liberals hate when taken against brutal dictators, but love when taken against American conservatives.
Post #: 200
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> RE: "Lipstick On A Pig" - Obama
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to: