Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

RE: Yahwah

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Christian Doctrine >> RE: Yahwah
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:06:19 PM   
Lapidoth

 

Posts: 3605
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: OKLAHOMA
Status: offline
I have a question of curiosity.

How long have you been a SNO advocate?

And do you adhere only to the African Publication "The Scriptures"?

_____________________________

Why does He keep quoting Torah? Doesn't He know He's about to abolish it?
http://www.tedpearce.com/Videos/TheForgottenpeople.html
BARUCH HABA BASHEM YAHUAH
Post #: 26
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:08:15 PM   
MichaelTheeArchAngel

 

Posts: 206
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
It was the Catholic Church that banned The Book of Enoch from scripture. Before then it was used by Jews and Christians from about 167 BC to 700 AD. I am what you would call a Judaizing (Judaeo Christian.) A true Protestant Christian does not follow the Catholic Church doctrine. Are you sure your not a Catholic? The reason I ask again is because everything you say supports Catholicism.
quote:

ORIGINAL: JimboFletch

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelTheeArchAngel
...Did you study the scripture that I posted above?...

I noticed that you referenced "Chapter 69 of Enoch." That isn't in my Protestant NT - in any of the versions I recognize as credible. Before today, I only thought Catholics accepted apocryphal books. What sect do you ascribe to, the Ethiopian Orthodox Church?
Post #: 27
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:10:37 PM   
DaveW


Posts: 4099
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: offline
I have an objection to "yahweh." It starts with the OPs 2nd sentance:
quote:

Take note that the letter [Ħ] in Biblical Hebrew was known as waw and pronounced as w,
The letter is VAV and is pronounced V. It is considered a christian construct to attach a W sound to it, probably from the influence of Greek. It may have had that in some of the helenized communitites, but not in original Hebrew.

Yud - hay - vav - hay should stay as it is IMO - without pronounciation.

_____________________________

Avatar is Saphira 5 months and Louvena at 23 months!
We are now grandparents TWICE!!
====================================
Our CD is now available here:
http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
Post #: 28
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:12:08 PM   
MichaelTheeArchAngel

 

Posts: 206
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
The word "God" is a general term. But no, I have no objection to that general term.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zhi

Do you have any objection to calling Yahwah God?
Post #: 29
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:14:15 PM   
evry1needsgod

 

Posts: 500
Status: offline
quote:

MichaelTheeArchAngel


I have no idea where you're at on this topic, so I must ask an honest question. Is it a mere conviction of yours to use these specific names of God, or do you believe it is a moral absolute for one to call God by the ascribed names? IOW, do you believe I am wrong/sinnig when I use the word "God" when praying or referring to Him?
Post #: 30
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:15:40 PM   
evry1needsgod

 

Posts: 500
Status: offline
Nevermind. You just answered my question while I was typing it.
Post #: 31
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:16:25 PM   
MichaelTheeArchAngel

 

Posts: 206
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
You are in error because vav is a modren Hebrew term. Waw is the ancient Semitic use. It was used by both Arabs and Hebrews before the Babylonian captivity.
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaveW

I have an objection to "yahweh." It starts with the OPs 2nd sentance:
quote:

Take note that the letter [Ħ] in Biblical Hebrew was known as waw and pronounced as w,
The letter is VAV and is pronounced V. It is considered a christian construct to attach a W sound to it, probably from the influence of Greek. It may have had that in some of the helenized communitites, but not in original Hebrew.

Yud - hay - vav - hay should stay as it is IMO - without pronounciation.
Post #: 32
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:20:37 PM   
MichaelTheeArchAngel

 

Posts: 206
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
I do not know what you are talking about. What is SNO?
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lapidoth

I have a question of curiosity.

How long have you been a SNO advocate?

And do you adhere only to the African Publication "The Scriptures"?
Post #: 33
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:23:49 PM   
Lapidoth

 

Posts: 3605
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: OKLAHOMA
Status: offline
So the next step is we can't Moses - Moses anymore?
We have to call him Moshe?

I've noticed that about our SNO's in our congregation.
They begin reverting to "some" Hebrew names and not the English.

Some of the names I can't pronounce in English, much less Hebrew.

You know, those "hard name" and those "harder names." LOL.




And I really don't know too many who don't know that God's name is YHVH.
Sure many don't, but many do. I've known that since I was 12 years old.

_____________________________

Why does He keep quoting Torah? Doesn't He know He's about to abolish it?
http://www.tedpearce.com/Videos/TheForgottenpeople.html
BARUCH HABA BASHEM YAHUAH
Post #: 34
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:25:26 PM   
DaveW


Posts: 4099
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: offline
SNO = Sacred Name Only

_____________________________

Avatar is Saphira 5 months and Louvena at 23 months!
We are now grandparents TWICE!!
====================================
Our CD is now available here:
http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
Post #: 35
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:25:27 PM   
Lapidoth

 

Posts: 3605
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: OKLAHOMA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelTheeArchAngel

I do not know what you are talking about. What is SNO?
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lapidoth

I have a question of curiosity.

How long have you been a SNO advocate?

And do you adhere only to the African Publication "The Scriptures"?



There is a sect that refuse to use the words, "lord," "God", "Jesus"
etc.

They use the words Yahweh and Yahshua.
And they demand everyone else do the same.

SNO = Sacred Name Only

_____________________________

Why does He keep quoting Torah? Doesn't He know He's about to abolish it?
http://www.tedpearce.com/Videos/TheForgottenpeople.html
BARUCH HABA BASHEM YAHUAH
Post #: 36
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 1:28:14 PM   
Lapidoth

 

Posts: 3605
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: OKLAHOMA
Status: offline
Here's a link to the name Yahweh.

What's In a Name?

And another link.

Sacred Name Concerns

_____________________________

Why does He keep quoting Torah? Doesn't He know He's about to abolish it?
http://www.tedpearce.com/Videos/TheForgottenpeople.html
BARUCH HABA BASHEM YAHUAH
Post #: 37
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 2:01:07 PM   
MichaelTheeArchAngel

 

Posts: 206
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
Thanks for the links. But here is a question for you. Should God answer to the name Allah? Or should Yahshua answer to the name Jesus? My name is Michael, should I answer to the name Tom? It's something to think about.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lapidoth

Here's a link to the name Yahweh.

What's In a Name?

And another link.

Sacred Name Concerns


_____________________________

Truth is made known by the reason of the facts.
Post #: 38
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 2:18:09 PM   
JimboFletch


Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelTheeArchAngel
A true Protestant Christian does not follow the Catholic Church doctrine. Are you sure your not a Catholic? The reason I ask again is because everything you say supports Catholicism.

I'm not the one worshipping a word-form and using a book only recognized by the so-called Ethiopian Orthodox Church as inspired text - which you refused to refute or embrace when I asked directly.

Unless you are ashamed, are you part of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church? If not, what sect do you most identify with, if you aren't ashamed to say?

If you're ashamed to say, that's fine, but it reduces your credibility to something around zip, nada, nothing.
Post #: 39
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 2:19:39 PM   
JimboFletch


Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelTheeArchAngel

Thanks for the links. But here is a question for you. Should God answer to the name Allah? Or should Yahshua answer to the name Jesus?

You and the Sovereign of the Universe are on first name basis? That's interesting...
Post #: 40
RE: MichaelTheeArchAngel Revealed - 7/30/2008 2:30:12 PM   
JimboFletch


Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
Guys, if you want to cut to the chase, Google "MichaelTheeArchAngel" and you'll find all you ever wanted to know about the brilliant work of this person.

There seems to be no end to strange doctrine....
Post #: 41
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 2:35:24 PM   
Zhi


Posts: 1443
Joined: 7/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Thanks for the links. But here is a question for you. Should God answer to the name Allah? Or should Yahshua answer to the name Jesus? My name is Michael, should I answer to the name Tom? It's something to think about.


Hmm. Allah and God are demonstrably theologically different beings, so I wouldn't expect God to answer to Allah.

But, my name is Heather, and I answer to "honey", "mama", "dear", "sweetie", "Zhi" (in forums and when I'm gaming online), and I even used to have the nicknames "tigger" and "brainy smurf" at various points in my life. It never occurred to me that these mostly-endearing nicknames and references should be something that I should take offense at or refuse to answer to.

In fact, my husband pretty much never calls me "Heather", and I pretty much never call him by his real name either... if anything because he's far more dear and close to me than anyone else, so I use terms of endearment, which I would never use for someone who's a friend (I will usually use their first names, though close friends sometimes have nicknames), and I would certainly never use for someone who is a formal acquaintaince (I will use their full formal name, like Mr. Thompson or what have you).

_____________________________

The optimist says the glass is half full. The pessimist says the glass is half empty. The engineer says the glass is twice as large as it needs to be.
Post #: 42
RE: MichaelTheeArchAngel Revealed - 7/30/2008 3:04:18 PM   
JimboFletch


Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
From one of several places MichaelTheeArchAngel has... shared:

I am a Judaeo Christian

I do not believe in Hell, Trinitarism or Sunday Sabbath.

A Jew is a convert to Judaism and the Hebrews are a race of people.

Contrary to popular belief, Jews are not a race, but a assembly of peoples.
They are the congregation of Zion. And that is according to scripture and history.
A Hebrew may or may not be a Jew.

Truth is made known by the reason of the facts.


Look familiar?
Post #: 43
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 3:21:49 PM   
benelchi


Posts: 2907
Joined: 9/14/2007
From: California
Status: online
There are a number of errors in this post, I will address just a few of them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelTheeArchAngel

Yahwah


Yahwah is God’s personal name based upon the ancient Semitic language. Take note that the letter [] in Biblical Hebrew was known as waw and pronounced as w, as in [] Yhwh, “Yahwah.” In Modern Hebrew [] is known as vav and pronounced as v. The derivation of Yahwah is from the ancient Semitic words HaYah and HaWah.
HaYah means “The Life or The Living.” HaWah means “The Beginning or The happening.” This is a partial list of words associated HaWah: Be, is, was, became, happened and appeared.


HaYaH doesn't mean life, that CHaYaH. The words look very similar in Hebrew but they are not the same. HaYah is spelled with a hey and CHaYaH is spelled with a Chet.

HaVah is not the equivalent of HaYah. When it is pointed as HoVeH or HayVeH is conjugation of HaYaH, but when it is pointed as HaWaH it is not related at all; HaVaH is from a different root and means wickedness.


quote:


Yahwah reveals His name to Moses
Exodus 3:13-15.
13 And Moses said to Elohiym, “Suppose I go to the siblings of the Israelites and say to them, 'The Elohiym of your forefathers has sent me to you,' and they ask me, 'What is His name?' What shall I say to them?” (Elohiym means, “God of The Living.”) It can also be translated as “god-s of the living” or “god-s of life,” for those who have life immortal.


Elohim does not mean God of the living, but simply means God. It is used most often as a majestic plural; and is used in conjunction with singular verbs. When it is used with a plural verb it would be translated as gods. The root of this word is 'el' which means god. God of the living would be 'elohay chi' or 'el chi'. BTW my screen name means 'son of the living God' i.e. 'ben el chi'


quote:


14 And Elohiym said to Moses, “The Living that Lives. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: 'The Living has sent me to you.” (HaYah) in the ancient Semitic language means: The Living, or The Life.)


The translation in our bibles is correct, "I am that I am"; in this verse the first person imperfect form of HYH i.e. the verb 'to be' is used, not the verb 'to live'. Again the first letter looks similar, but it is NOT the same. The left leg of the letter chet connects to the top, but in a hey there is a small gap between the top of the left leg and the top part of the letter; this small gap is important because these are truly different letters of the alphabet.

quote:


A brief history lesson
After 300 B.C. Adonai became more frequently used than Yahwah. And the Books of Esther, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Solomon do not use the name Yahwah. The title “Lord” (Adonai) is usually a substitute for the divine name: Yahwah.
Origen reported that when Jews read the name Yahwah, they would pronounce it Adonai, while non Jews would pronounce it Kurios.
In the Greek translation of the Old Testament (Septuagint), written before the time of Christ, “Yahwah” was written in Hebrew consonant characters. In the Dead Sea Scrolls, the scribes out of respect for the name wrote it in ancient Hebrew script rather in their normal script.


I am unaware of any copy of the LXX that uses the Hebrew script for YHWH, do you have a source for this information?

This use of the old script in the DDS was only characteristic of a few of the very oldest scrolls, most did not exhibit this.

quote:


Later on, Christian scribes replaced the Hebrew characters in the Greek Bible with Kurios. Scribes translating the Hebrew Bible showed that Yahwah should not be pronounced, but read as Adonai by substituting the Hebrew vowels of Adonai for those of Yahwah when writing the divine name. Later on, readers who did not know this history did not pronounce Yahwah; but neither did they pronounce Adonai, as the scribes intended. As a result the Middle Ages readers of the Hebrew Bible began pronouncing precisely what was written, and the mixture of consonants from Yahwah and vowels from Adonai, producing the pronunciation of Jehovah, a word that never existed for speakers of ancient Hebrew.

The word "Jehovah" comes from the fact that ancient Jewish texts used to put the vowels of the Name "Adonai" (the usual substitute for YHWH) with the consonants of YHWH to remind people not to pronounce YHWH as written. A sixteenth century German Christian scribe, while transliterating the Bible into Latin for the Pope, wrote the Name out as it appeared in his texts, with the consonants of YHWH and the vowels of Adonai, and came up with the word JeHoVaH.


The history is a little mixed up here. The masorah that denoted the vowels in Hebrew didn't exist until the middle ages. Up until that time the substitution of adonai for YHWH was done by oral tradition and not because of anything indicated in the text.

quote:


The number of letters in the Hebrew alphabet, their order, their names, and their phonetic values are virtually identical to those of the Aramaic alphabet, as both Hebrews and Arameans borrowed the Phoenician alphabet for their uses during the end of the 2nd millennium BC.
The modern script used for writing Hebrew (usually called the Jewish script by scholars, and also traditionally known as the square script, block script, or Assyrian script; not to be confused with the Eastern variant of the Syriac alphabet) evolved during the 3rd century BC from the Aramaic script, which was used by Jews for writing Hebrew since the 6th century BC. Prior to that, Hebrew was written using the old Hebrew script, which evolved from the 10th century BC Phoenician script.

The original pictograph used in the Early Semitic script is a Y shape, a picture of a tent peg. The tent pegs were made of wood and may have been Y-shaped to prevent the rope from slipping off.

The Modern Hebrew name for this letter is “vav”, a word meaning “peg” or “hook”. This letter is used in Modern Hebrew as a consonant with a “v” sound and as a vowel. If the Modern Hebrew letter appears as (וֹ), it is the vowel sound “ow” and if it appears as (וּ), it is the vowel sound “uw”. When used as a vowel the ancient pronunciation was also an “ow” or “uw”. In each consonant, vowel letters of the Ancient Hebrew language the pronunciation of the consonant is closely related to the pronunciation of the vowel such as the letter “hey” is “h” and “eh,” and the pronunciation of the letter “yud” is “y” and “iy”. For this reason, it is probable that the original pronunciation of the letter Y was with a “w”. In Modern and Ancient Arabic language, this letter is also pronounced with a “w”. Therefore, the original name of this letter would have been “waw” instead of “vav”.

In regards to the consonant “W” in the name YHWH

Wāw serves several functions in the Arabic language. Perhaps foremost among them is that it is the primary conjunction in Arabic, equivalent to "and"; it is usually prefixed to other conjunctions, such as ولكن wa-lakin, meaning "but". Another function is the "oath", by preceding a noun of great significantly valued by the speaker. It is often literally translatable to "By..." or "I swear to...", and is often used in the Qur'an in this way, and also in the generally fixed construction والله wallah ("By Allah!" or "I swear to God!").

An oath (from Anglo-Saxon āð, also called plight) is either a promise or a statement of fact calling upon something or someone that the oath maker considers sacred, usually a god, as a witness to the binding nature of the promise or the truth of the statement of fact.
Chapter 69 of Enoch

This requested Michael, to show him the hidden name that he might enunciate it in the oath, so that those might quake before that name and oath who revealed all that was in secret to the children of men. And this is the power of this oath, for it is powerful and strong, and he placed this oath (Akae) in the hand of Michael. (Akae) is not a word, it is most likely an authors note, it could mean, “Also Known As Elohiym” or “Also Known As Eagle.” Michael’s seal could be the double winged eagle found in the Dead Sea Scrolls. The four winged Cherubim in Ezekiel may also have a relationship.


Again there are a lot of mixed of facts in this last section. Yes a prefixed vav is the conjuction 'and', 'but', etc...; however, many Hebrew letters are used as prefixes. The prefixed 'bet' is used as 'in' or 'with', 'mem' is used as 'from', 'kaph' is used as 'like', 'as', etc..., and the prefixed hey can be used as the article 'the', or the interrogative 'if'. The fact that these letter are used is prefixes make no difference to how they are understood when they are used as part of Hebrew root.
Post #: 44
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 3:38:02 PM  1 votes
Odeliya

 

Posts: 2380
Joined: 8/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: benelchi

There are a number of errors in this post, I will address just a few of them.




that was really highly unnecessary, Benelchi darling, not worthy of your time.

Your critique of the post was akin trying to criticize Barney’s creators for making a dinosaur purple and singing in English. You should have maybe read thru the rest of the thread , including Jimbo’s last posts – he lets us in on a joke.

JF also made a great suggestion here

quote:

we can close this puppy( thread) and have a cup of good coffee and a donut - or two.

I take coffee, but no doughnuts. If I start eating 2 doughnuts at one sitting my alternative name will be prety soon : Sufganiyot .

_____________________________

Proverbs XI:14 Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counselors there is safety.
Post #: 45
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 4:04:13 PM   
Bluethread


Posts: 1492
Joined: 11/8/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelTheeArchAngel

Should God answer to the name Allah? Or should Yahshua answer to the name Jesus? My name is Michael, should I answer to the name Tom? It's something to think about.



Are you really Thee Arch Angel? Isn't your avitar also a misuse of a biblical title, by your standard?

_____________________________

"Show me wherein I have errored and I will hold my tongue." Iyov(Job)
Post #: 46
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 4:36:17 PM   
MichaelTheeArchAngel

 

Posts: 206
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
I suggest you recheck sources. You do know that biblical Hebrew is a little bit different than the the modren Hebrew?
quote:

ORIGINAL: benelchi

There are a number of errors in this post, I will address just a few of them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelTheeArchAngel

Yahwah


Yahwah is God’s personal name based upon the ancient Semitic language. Take note that the letter [] in Biblical Hebrew was known as waw and pronounced as w, as in [] Yhwh, “Yahwah.” In Modern Hebrew [] is known as vav and pronounced as v. The derivation of Yahwah is from the ancient Semitic words HaYah and HaWah.
HaYah means “The Life or The Living.” HaWah means “The Beginning or The happening.” This is a partial list of words associated HaWah: Be, is, was, became, happened and appeared.


HaYaH doesn't mean life, that CHaYaH. The words look very similar in Hebrew but they are not the same. HaYah is spelled with a hey and CHaYaH is spelled with a Chet.

HaVah is not the equivalent of HaYah. When it is pointed as HoVeH or HayVeH is conjugation of HaYaH, but when it is pointed as HaWaH it is not related at all; HaVaH is from a different root and means wickedness.


quote:


Yahwah reveals His name to Moses
Exodus 3:13-15.
13 And Moses said to Elohiym, “Suppose I go to the siblings of the Israelites and say to them, 'The Elohiym of your forefathers has sent me to you,' and they ask me, 'What is His name?' What shall I say to them?” (Elohiym means, “God of The Living.”) It can also be translated as “god-s of the living” or “god-s of life,” for those who have life immortal.


Elohim does not mean God of the living, but simply means God. It is used most often as a majestic plural; and is used in conjunction with singular verbs. When it is used with a plural verb it would be translated as gods. The root of this word is 'el' which means god. God of the living would be 'elohay chi' or 'el chi'. BTW my screen name means 'son of the living God' i.e. 'ben el chi'


quote:


14 And Elohiym said to Moses, “The Living that Lives. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: 'The Living has sent me to you.” (HaYah) in the ancient Semitic language means: The Living, or The Life.)


The translation in our bibles is correct, "I am that I am"; in this verse the first person imperfect form of HYH i.e. the verb 'to be' is used, not the verb 'to live'. Again the first letter looks similar, but it is NOT the same. The left leg of the letter chet connects to the top, but in a hey there is a small gap between the top of the left leg and the top part of the letter; this small gap is important because these are truly different letters of the alphabet.

quote:


A brief history lesson
After 300 B.C. Adonai became more frequently used than Yahwah. And the Books of Esther, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Solomon do not use the name Yahwah. The title “Lord” (Adonai) is usually a substitute for the divine name: Yahwah.
Origen reported that when Jews read the name Yahwah, they would pronounce it Adonai, while non Jews would pronounce it Kurios.
In the Greek translation of the Old Testament (Septuagint), written before the time of Christ, “Yahwah” was written in Hebrew consonant characters. In the Dead Sea Scrolls, the scribes out of respect for the name wrote it in ancient Hebrew script rather in their normal script.


I am unaware of any copy of the LXX that uses the Hebrew script for YHWH, do you have a source for this information?

This use of the old script in the DDS was only characteristic of a few of the very oldest scrolls, most did not exhibit this.

quote:


Later on, Christian scribes replaced the Hebrew characters in the Greek Bible with Kurios. Scribes translating the Hebrew Bible showed that Yahwah should not be pronounced, but read as Adonai by substituting the Hebrew vowels of Adonai for those of Yahwah when writing the divine name. Later on, readers who did not know this history did not pronounce Yahwah; but neither did they pronounce Adonai, as the scribes intended. As a result the Middle Ages readers of the Hebrew Bible began pronouncing precisely what was written, and the mixture of consonants from Yahwah and vowels from Adonai, producing the pronunciation of Jehovah, a word that never existed for speakers of ancient Hebrew.

The word "Jehovah" comes from the fact that ancient Jewish texts used to put the vowels of the Name "Adonai" (the usual substitute for YHWH) with the consonants of YHWH to remind people not to pronounce YHWH as written. A sixteenth century German Christian scribe, while transliterating the Bible into Latin for the Pope, wrote the Name out as it appeared in his texts, with the consonants of YHWH and the vowels of Adonai, and came up with the word JeHoVaH.


The history is a little mixed up here. The masorah that denoted the vowels in Hebrew didn't exist until the middle ages. Up until that time the substitution of adonai for YHWH was done by oral tradition and not because of anything indicated in the text.

quote:


The number of letters in the Hebrew alphabet, their order, their names, and their phonetic values are virtually identical to those of the Aramaic alphabet, as both Hebrews and Arameans borrowed the Phoenician alphabet for their uses during the end of the 2nd millennium BC.
The modern script used for writing Hebrew (usually called the Jewish script by scholars, and also traditionally known as the square script, block script, or Assyrian script; not to be confused with the Eastern variant of the Syriac alphabet) evolved during the 3rd century BC from the Aramaic script, which was used by Jews for writing Hebrew since the 6th century BC. Prior to that, Hebrew was written using the old Hebrew script, which evolved from the 10th century BC Phoenician script.

The original pictograph used in the Early Semitic script is a Y shape, a picture of a tent peg. The tent pegs were made of wood and may have been Y-shaped to prevent the rope from slipping off.

The Modern Hebrew name for this letter is “vav”, a word meaning “peg” or “hook”. This letter is used in Modern Hebrew as a consonant with a “v” sound and as a vowel. If the Modern Hebrew letter appears as (וֹ), it is the vowel sound “ow” and if it appears as (וּ), it is the vowel sound “uw”. When used as a vowel the ancient pronunciation was also an “ow” or “uw”. In each consonant, vowel letters of the Ancient Hebrew language the pronunciation of the consonant is closely related to the pronunciation of the vowel such as the letter “hey” is “h” and “eh,” and the pronunciation of the letter “yud” is “y” and “iy”. For this reason, it is probable that the original pronunciation of the letter Y was with a “w”. In Modern and Ancient Arabic language, this letter is also pronounced with a “w”. Therefore, the original name of this letter would have been “waw” instead of “vav”.

In regards to the consonant “W” in the name YHWH

Wāw serves several functions in the Arabic language. Perhaps foremost among them is that it is the primary conjunction in Arabic, equivalent to "and"; it is usually prefixed to other conjunctions, such as ولكن wa-lakin, meaning "but". Another function is the "oath", by preceding a noun of great significantly valued by the speaker. It is often literally translatable to "By..." or "I swear to...", and is often used in the Qur'an in this way, and also in the generally fixed construction والله wallah ("By Allah!" or "I swear to God!").

An oath (from Anglo-Saxon āð, also called plight) is either a promise or a statement of fact calling upon something or someone that the oath maker considers sacred, usually a god, as a witness to the binding nature of the promise or the truth of the statement of fact.
Chapter 69 of Enoch

This requested Michael, to show him the hidden name that he might enunciate it in the oath, so that those might quake before that name and oath who revealed all that was in secret to the children of men. And this is the power of this oath, for it is powerful and strong, and he placed this oath (Akae) in the hand of Michael. (Akae) is not a word, it is most likely an authors note, it could mean, “Also Known As Elohiym” or “Also Known As Eagle.” Michael’s seal could be the double winged eagle found in the Dead Sea Scrolls. The four winged Cherubim in Ezekiel may also have a relationship.


Again there are a lot of mixed of facts in this last section. Yes a prefixed vav is the conjuction 'and', 'but', etc...; however, many Hebrew letters are used as prefixes. The prefixed 'bet' is used as 'in' or 'with', 'mem' is used as 'from', 'kaph' is used as 'like', 'as', etc..., and the prefixed hey can be used as the article 'the', or the interrogative 'if'. The fact that these letter are used is prefixes make no difference to how they are understood when they are used as part of Hebrew root.

quote:

CHaYaH
Post #: 47
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 4:40:41 PM   
JimboFletch


Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelTheeArchAngel

I suggest you recheck sources. You do know that biblical Hebrew is a little bit different than the the modren Hebrew?

And having a premise and years of honing it precludes any possibility that you'd consider your error.


If you noticed, your sources have been checked.... so....

...Translate this:
MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN
Post #: 48
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 4:44:44 PM   
MichaelTheeArchAngel

 

Posts: 206
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
Michael is a person of intrest to me, and the avitar is the one that worked for me. Besides, I may want to write about Michael.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bluethread

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelTheeArchAngel

Should God answer to the name Allah? Or should Yahshua answer to the name Jesus? My name is Michael, should I answer to the name Tom? It's something to think about.



Are you really Thee Arch Angel? Isn't your avitar also a misuse of a biblical title, by your standard?
Post #: 49
RE: Yahwah - 7/30/2008 4:46:40 PM   
Zhi


Posts: 1443
Joined: 7/31/2007
Status: offline
I found Benelchi's comments really interesting :)

Now, in the spirit of donut sharing, I shall pass around the chocolate oatmeal brownies I just pulled out of the oven (because in my current state, that was the only thing that sounded good for lunch. hee)

_____________________________

The optimist says the glass is half full. The pessimist says the glass is half empty. The engineer says the glass is twice as large as it needs to be.
Post #: 50
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Christian Doctrine >> RE: Yahwah
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev