|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login  | |
|
Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/2/2009 6:02:47 PM
|
|
|
neuronstatic
Posts: 1242
Joined: 7/14/2005
From: North Carolina!
Status: offline
|
After my experience with Ubuntu 8.10, I could not wait for 9.04 to fix all of its bugs. At that time I decided "no more x.10 Ubuntu releases". But after reading about some of the features and bug fixes included in 9.10, I decided to go ahead and upgrade one of my non-mission-critical desktops at work. I will leave my main machine (and thus mission-critical) on Ubuntu 9.04 for the interim.
I really like the visual updates. Yeah, I know that the visuals are not substantive, but I still like them. I like the fact that I got Firefox 3.5.4 out of the box with the install. That was pleasing.
During the upgrade, I noticed the installer decided to remove a few "obsolete" packages without offering alternatives, or later versions. I don't necessarily like that but nothing was so critical that reinstalling the later version would not make me happy. This was probably done to prevent version mismatch nightmares for synaptic.
I have not tried anything with the Ubuntu One service so I have no comments.
The only settings I "lost" were the mods I made to gdm for launching synergy client. But that was a 1 minute fix.
Anyone else have any experience with this latest release?
_____________________________
Click here for an example of God blessing a man with a second chance at marriage in a new wife.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/2/2009 6:08:16 PM
|
|
|
rawr.ben
Posts: 2718
Joined: 5/16/2005
Status: offline
|
My video is still choppy.
_____________________________
rawr.ben
Facebook
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/2/2009 10:04:26 PM
|
|
|
walterquez
Posts: 1847
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
Ok, I am going to download it now; I have been waiting for ages for this release. Can't believe I missed it.
_____________________________
St. Athanasius the Great
For our Canons and our forms were not given to the Churches at the present day, but were wisely and safely transmitted to us from our forefathers.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/3/2009 11:25:04 AM
|
|
|
DaveW
Posts: 3812
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: offline
|
Started to install it Sunday eve. Apparently did something wrong and it started to overwrite my fresh install of Win7.
Backed out fast and had to rebuild the Win7 directory system with chkdsk.
_____________________________
Avatar is my daughter Laura and SIL David on their wedding 9/20/09 ====================================
Our CD is now available here:
http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/3/2009 1:26:35 PM
|
|
|
DaveW
Posts: 3812
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: offline
|
quote:
Well DaveW, "be careful little hands what you click..." Sounds like something my son said....
I think he will do the install when he has time... if he has time...
_____________________________
Avatar is my daughter Laura and SIL David on their wedding 9/20/09 ====================================
Our CD is now available here:
http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/3/2009 2:25:09 PM
|
|
|
PGAGA
Posts: 25
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
The update to 9.10 was the smoothest thus far (I started with 8.04). Everything worked without waiting for further updates.
My Ubuntu install is on a try boot laptop with WinXP, Ubuntu and eComstation (OS/2). When installing I had to make sure the Grub was installed the Linux partition because I use eComstation Boot Manager for multi booting.
Phil
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/3/2009 4:00:22 PM
|
|
|
walterquez
Posts: 1847
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
OS/2 Warp? I still have a copy.
_____________________________
St. Athanasius the Great
For our Canons and our forms were not given to the Churches at the present day, but were wisely and safely transmitted to us from our forefathers.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/4/2009 6:58:43 AM
|
|
|
DaveW
Posts: 3812
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: walterquez
OS/2 Warp? I still have a copy. I used to have a bumpersticker that said:
OS/2 PS2 MCA
JUST SAY NO!
_____________________________
Avatar is my daughter Laura and SIL David on their wedding 9/20/09 ====================================
Our CD is now available here:
http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/4/2009 2:39:33 PM
|
|
|
PGAGA
Posts: 25
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
|
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
I still have a copy of the install disks for Microsoft OS/2 version 1.0. eComStation is the continuing development of the operating system from Warp 4.5. Version 2.0 is now in Silver Release.
Linux and eCS play well together as long as one remembers to but the grub on the Linux install partition. There is even a user group devoted to users of both.
Phil
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/5/2009 7:45:16 AM
|
|
|
DaveW
Posts: 3812
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: offline
|
My son did the install last evening. I had to run chkdsk AGAIN on the Win7 partition. No wireless yet on the Ubuntu side, driver problem.
_____________________________
Avatar is my daughter Laura and SIL David on their wedding 9/20/09 ====================================
Our CD is now available here:
http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/18/2009 4:50:31 AM
|
|
|
potter22
Posts: 10
Joined: 11/18/2009
Status: offline
|
I have used Ubuntu 2 month. It has very slow processing. that is why now this time I am using window xp
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Ubuntu 9.10, yes/no? - 11/18/2009 9:21:57 AM
|
|
|
neuronstatic
Posts: 1242
Joined: 7/14/2005
From: North Carolina!
Status: offline
|
So I found my first 9.10 glitch. Apparently there is something amiss with using Eclipse and Ubuntu 9.10 involving some buttons. Not sure of all the details but as I use variations of Eclipse as my main IDE(s), I will stick with 9.04 on my main box for now.
Slow processing? Ubuntu and Linux in general typically have rank behind Windows in multi-media applications benchmarks. This is chalked up to the fact that Linux does not have the proprietary codecs and compressors that vendors provide to Microsoft and they include in Windows distributions.
However, for straight out business apps where multi-tasking (and multi-processing) are the critical factors, Ubuntu and Linux in general have a long track record of kicking Windows' pants in such benchmarks.
But yeah, if you are doing a lot of video/audio/graphics work, I think the benchmarks well demonstrate Windows has the lead. Since I don't normally do a lot of that, I never notice anything but being amazingly faster performance over Windows.
_____________________________
Click here for an example of God blessing a man with a second chance at marriage in a new wife.
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
Forum Tools
Printable Version
