|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
ID & voting - 11/2/2008 7:29:38 PM
|
|
|
RichLP
Posts: 1533
Joined: 5/4/2005
Status: offline
|
Are you required to bring a government-issued photo ID to vote in your area? If I recall, in 2004, I had to present ID. But when I voted in 2006, I wasn't required to - and that frightened me. I also was uncomfortable with the fact that in 2004 and in 2006, the "volunteers" helping out were often senior citizens who moved extremely slowly, who at one point wasted several minutes w/ the paperwork, and in one case, an otherwise warm and nice grandfatherly man did not even speak English.
_____________________________
"We have removed an ally of Al Qaeda" - G.W. Bush lies to America and to the world, 5/1/2003
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/2/2008 7:37:47 PM
|
|
|
Zhi
Posts: 1501
Joined: 7/31/2007
Status: online
|
Yep. We're required to. I'm really astonished that some places don't require the level of security to safeguard your sacred right to vote that, say, a mere credit card company would require for you to get a credit card.
_____________________________
The optimist says the glass is half full. The pessimist says the glass is half empty. The engineer says the glass is twice as large as it needs to be.
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/2/2008 7:40:08 PM
|
|
|
relady
Posts: 1209
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Greater St. Louis Metro
Status: offline
|
We have to show ID, but there are several accepted types. I thought we required photo ID, but we don't. One can bring a current utility bill or one's voter registration card. I generally just pull out my DL and that satisfies everyone.
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/2/2008 9:27:21 PM
|
|
|
leonfigg3
Posts: 376
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RichLP I also was uncomfortable with the fact that in 2004 and in 2006, the "volunteers" helping out were often senior citizens who moved extremely slowly, who at one point wasted several minutes w/ the paperwork, and in one case, an otherwise warm and nice grandfatherly man did not even speak English.[/font][/size] RichLP, I know that you do not like my responses to your posts, but being an election judge, our proper title, I feel I need to respond to this post. We are not merely "volunteers" We have duties and responsibilities on election day. Those duties and responsibilities take time, because they have to be precise so that every vote has a chance to be counted, especially when a voter has a problem that needs additional paperwork to resolve. Yes, most election judges are elderly. Some may not even speak English very well. However, they are more active and more involved in the process than those who sit back and do very little else but be critical and judgfemental about the process than actually take part in it, and get to know it. I'll get off my soap box now.
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/2/2008 11:31:12 PM
|
|
|
GregandJenny
Posts: 676
Joined: 2/16/2006
From: Near Seattle Washington
Status: offline
|
NO, but our signatures must match on the ballot or they will send you a letter asking you to verify your identity. Our county does ALL mail in.
_____________________________
It does not have to be well with my circumstance to be well with my soul!
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/2/2008 11:55:20 PM
|
|
|
essentialsaltes
Posts: 1021
Joined: 10/14/2007
From: Inglewood, CA
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RichLP Are you required to bring a government-issued photo ID to vote in your area? Check with your local election officials or your state's Secretary of State (of whoever handles elections). I think the only time I ever showed ID in California was when I had recently moved and had to cast a provisional ballot. Actually, I believe I showed a gas bill addressed to the new address.
_____________________________
"My object in all arguments is not to make any preconceived opinion of mine seem right, but merely to discover and establish the truth, whatever the truth may be." -- HP Lovecraft, letter to Robert E. Howard 7/27-28/34
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 6:16:35 AM
|
|
|
RichLP
Posts: 1533
Joined: 5/4/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leonfigg3 quote:
ORIGINAL: RichLP I also was uncomfortable with the fact that in 2004 and in 2006, the "volunteers" helping out were often senior citizens who moved extremely slowly, who at one point wasted several minutes w/ the paperwork, and in one case, an otherwise warm and nice grandfatherly man did not even speak English. RichLP, I know that you do not like my responses to your posts, but being an election judge, our proper title, I feel I need to respond to this post. We are not merely "volunteers" We have duties and responsibilities on election day. Those duties and responsibilities take time, because they have to be precise so that every vote has a chance to be counted, especially when a voter has a problem that needs additional paperwork to resolve. Yes, most election judges are elderly. Some may not even speak English very well. However, they are more active and more involved in the process than those who sit back and do very little else but be critical and judgfemental about the process than actually take part in it, and get to know it. I'll get off my soap box now. If this was a stab at me, it didn't work - although I will continue to be critical and judgmental.
_____________________________
"We have removed an ally of Al Qaeda" - G.W. Bush lies to America and to the world, 5/1/2003
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 9:46:06 AM
|
|
|
leonfigg3
Posts: 376
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RichLP quote:
ORIGINAL: leonfigg3 quote:
ORIGINAL: RichLP I also was uncomfortable with the fact that in 2004 and in 2006, the "volunteers" helping out were often senior citizens who moved extremely slowly, who at one point wasted several minutes w/ the paperwork, and in one case, an otherwise warm and nice grandfatherly man did not even speak English. RichLP, I know that you do not like my responses to your posts, but being an election judge, our proper title, I feel I need to respond to this post. We are not merely "volunteers" We have duties and responsibilities on election day. Those duties and responsibilities take time, because they have to be precise so that every vote has a chance to be counted, especially when a voter has a problem that needs additional paperwork to resolve. Yes, most election judges are elderly. Some may not even speak English very well. However, they are more active and more involved in the process than those who sit back and do very little else but be critical and judgfemental about the process than actually take part in it, and get to know it. I'll get off my soap box now. If this was a stab at me, it didn't work - although I will continue to be critical and judgmental. No it was not so much a stab at you as it was meant to be an attempt to educate and challenge you to be less judgementl and critical of people who actually take the time to be involved in the process rather than standing on the sidelines.
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 9:54:16 AM
|
|
|
RichLP
Posts: 1533
Joined: 5/4/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leonfigg3 No it was not so much a stab at you as it was meant to be an attempt to educate and challenge you to be less judgementl and critical of people who actually take the time to be involved in the process rather than standing on the sidelines. Ah, but I'm entitled to my opinion, and if I am not comfortable with non-English speaking senior citizens who move slowly, I have the right to feel that way. And if you had presented your point in a less than hostile manner, I might've been more open to what you said. But it almost seems as if when you write me, you want to 'attack' me. Not that it bothers me - I like to argue. Thanks for serving as a judge btw.
_____________________________
"We have removed an ally of Al Qaeda" - G.W. Bush lies to America and to the world, 5/1/2003
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 10:03:39 AM
|
|
|
benelchi
Posts: 3609
Joined: 9/14/2007
From: California
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Zhi Yep. We're required to. I'm really astonished that some places don't require the level of security to safeguard your sacred right to vote that, say, a mere credit card company would require for you to get a credit card. In my area a piece of mail is sufficient to "prove" your identity. The democratic party has fought hard to prevent any requirements for ID here in my state. (Likely because ID could shift the balance of power)
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 10:09:41 AM
|
|
|
Zhi
Posts: 1501
Joined: 7/31/2007
Status: online
|
quote:
In my area a piece of mail is sufficient to "prove" your identity. The democratic party has fought hard to prevent any requirements for ID here in my state. (Likely because ID could shift the balance of power) Amazing. I mean, I needed a photo ID to get a library card for crying out loud, plus a bill to my new address because I hadn't got the change in quite yet. Why do some places seem to think that honesty and accuracy in voting has so little worth? I mean, our entire government is based on that. It's horrifying.
_____________________________
The optimist says the glass is half full. The pessimist says the glass is half empty. The engineer says the glass is twice as large as it needs to be.
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 10:22:01 AM
|
|
|
benelchi
Posts: 3609
Joined: 9/14/2007
From: California
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Zhi quote:
In my area a piece of mail is sufficient to "prove" your identity. The democratic party has fought hard to prevent any requirements for ID here in my state. (Likely because ID could shift the balance of power) Amazing. I mean, I needed a photo ID to get a library card for crying out loud, plus a bill to my new address because I hadn't got the change in quite yet. Why do some places seem to think that honesty and accuracy in voting has so little worth? I mean, our entire government is based on that. It's horrifying. Based on what I have seen in my own state, it seems that those who most oppose ID, are those who will most likely benefit most from voter fraud.
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 4:42:11 PM
|
|
|
leonfigg3
Posts: 376
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RichLP quote:
ORIGINAL: leonfigg3 No it was not so much a stab at you as it was meant to be an attempt to educate and challenge you to be less judgementl and critical of people who actually take the time to be involved in the process rather than standing on the sidelines. Ah, but I'm entitled to my opinion, and if I am not comfortable with non-English speaking senior citizens who move slowly, I have the right to feel that way. And if you had presented your point in a less than hostile manner, I might've been more open to what you said. But it almost seems as if when you write me, you want to 'attack' me. Not that it bothers me - I like to argue. Thanks for serving as a judge btw. RichLP, I am well aware that you are probably going to tell me that this is not neccessary , but I would like apologize for the way I responded to your post. Yes, you are entitled to your oponion. Like others on these forums, there are some things I tend to take very seriously, almost personally. Being an election judge seems to be one of those. I do not seem to be as patient as I usually tend to be with with people who seem to demean or put down election judges. To begin with I do not believe a whole lot of Americans take their responsibility to vote seriously enough. I also tend to feel that a lot more people rather complain about the system than learn about it, or even become a part of it, in some way. In the time I have been an election judge I have seen a first time voter sit and wait 45 minutes, for us to resolve an issue with his ability to vote. I have also seen a voter who had not voted in so long that he was removed form the roll storm out after 15 minutes as we tried to resolve his problem so he could vote. I have seen a person on his his death bed brought in on a stretcher because he insisted on voting, in person, before he passed away. I've seen an untold number of mistakes people have made while voting, some we were able to help with, and some we were not able to help with. There is a very good reason why election judges are slow and deliberate during the day. Aside from all that we are responsible for during the day (keeping the polling place neat, ordely, the line moving, and problems resolved)), at the end of the day, after the polls close, we HAVE to make sure that the number of voters who came into vote matches the number of ballots cast, or at least come very, very, close to matching. If we are unable to get the numbers to match up then it becomes the job/ responsibility of the election commission to resolve the issue. Back to our issues. I know you like to argue, may be you like to argue more than I am comfortable with. Maybe that is why it seems that I not only have to be on the offensive with you, but also on the defensive. Arguing about issues makes me uncomfortable, though I seem to like the challenge. Trouble is, I also tend to get a little hot under the collar and a little carried away. Discussing issues, seems to be more of what I am more comfortable with. See you around the forums
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 4:51:59 PM
|
|
|
Acts29
Posts: 374
Joined: 1/14/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leonfigg3 quote:
ORIGINAL: RichLP quote:
ORIGINAL: leonfigg3 No it was not so much a stab at you as it was meant to be an attempt to educate and challenge you to be less judgementl and critical of people who actually take the time to be involved in the process rather than standing on the sidelines. Ah, but I'm entitled to my opinion, and if I am not comfortable with non-English speaking senior citizens who move slowly, I have the right to feel that way. And if you had presented your point in a less than hostile manner, I might've been more open to what you said. But it almost seems as if when you write me, you want to 'attack' me. Not that it bothers me - I like to argue. Thanks for serving as a judge btw. RichLP, I am well aware that you are probably going to tell me that this is not neccessary , but I would like apologize for the way I responded to your post. Yes, you are entitled to your oponion. Like others on these forums, there are some things I tend to take very seriously, almost personally. Being an election judge seems to be one of those. I do not seem to be as patient as I usually tend to be with with people who seem to demean or put down election judges. To begin with I do not believe a whole lot of Americans take their responsibility to vote seriously enough. I also tend to feel that a lot more people rather complain about the system than learn about it, or even become a part of it, in some way. In the time I have been an election judge I have seen a first time voter sit and wait 45 minutes, for us to resolve an issue with his ability to vote. I have also seen a voter who had not voted in so long that he was removed form the roll storm out after 15 minutes as we tried to resolve his problem so he could vote. I have seen a person on his his death bed brought in on a stretcher because he insisted on voting, in person, before he passed away. I've seen an untold number of mistakes people have made while voting, some we were able to help with, and some we were not able to help with. There is a very good reason why election judges are slow and deliberate during the day. Aside from all that we are responsible for during the day (keeping the polling place neat, ordely, the line moving, and problems resolved)), at the end of the day, after the polls close, we HAVE to make sure that the number of voters who came into vote matches the number of ballots cast, or at least come very, very, close to matching. If we are unable to get the numbers to match up then it becomes the job/ responsibility of the election commission to resolve the issue. Back to our issues. I know you like to argue, may be you like to argue more than I am comfortable with. Maybe that is why it seems that I not only have to be on the offensive with you, but also on the defensive. Arguing about issues makes me uncomfortable, though I seem to like the challenge. Trouble is, I also tend to get a little hot under the collar and a little carried away. Discussing issues, seems to be more of what I am more comfortable with. See you around the forums I went back and reread the responses from leonfigg3 several times. I do not see anything in his posts that appeared to be hostile. I really do believe the word hostile is a little extreme.
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 4:55:12 PM
|
|
|
luvmy3kids
Posts: 150
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
|
I agree with Sherlock holmes. (sorry forgot your username). Those Volunteers do a lot to help make our voting go smoothly. They work very hard. But in my state you have to match the signiture line and brand new voters must show ID. Everything is computerized here and I found the older volunteers were doing as well as the younger ones. They all had smiles on there faces and willing to take the time to explain anything they could. I can understand why they would have a non english speaking person there. We have many citizens that English is not there first laungage and I'm sure it helped the lines go by faster with someone who could speak to them in their comfortable laungage to get there vote going.
_____________________________
Luvmy3Kids
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 4:59:56 PM
|
|
|
earthless
Posts: 6352
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: where pigeons are wearing sweaters....
Status: online
|
No requirement and no questions asked where I live (one of the U.S. largest cities..). Then again, my city is long known for 'vote early and vote often...'
_____________________________
Probing Today's Religious Movements | Promoting Doctrinal Discernment & Critical Thinking | Providing Reasons for Christian Faith & Ethics
|
|
|
|
RE: ID & voting - 11/3/2008 5:00:50 PM
|
|
|
RichLP
Posts: 1533
Joined: 5/4/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leonfigg3 RichLP, I am well aware that you are probably going to tell me that this is not neccessary , but I would like apologize for the way I responded to your post. Yes, you are entitled to your oponion. Like others on these forums, there are some things I tend to take very seriously, almost personally. Being an election judge seems to be one of those. I do not seem to be as patient as I usually tend to be with with people who seem to demean or put down election judges. To begin with I do not believe a whole lot of Americans take their responsibility to vote seriously enough. I also tend to feel that a lot more people rather complain about the system than learn about it, or even become a part of it, in some way. In the time I have been an election judge I have seen a first time voter sit and wait 45 minutes, for us to resolve an issue with his ability to vote. I have also seen a voter who had not voted in so long that he was removed form the roll storm out after 15 minutes as we tried to resolve his problem so he could vote. I have seen a person on his his death bed brought in on a stretcher because he insisted on voting, in person, before he passed away. I've seen an untold number of mistakes people have made while voting, some we were able to help with, and some we were not able to help with. There is a very good reason why election judges are slow and deliberate during the day. Aside from all that we are responsible for during the day (keeping the polling place neat, ordely, the line moving, and problems resolved)), at the end of the day, after the polls close, we HAVE to make sure that the number of voters who came into vote matches the number of ballots cast, or at least come very, very, close to matching. If we are unable to get the numbers to match up then it becomes the job/ responsibility of the election commission to resolve the issue. Back to our issues. I know you like to argue, may be you like to argue more than I am comfortable with. Maybe that is why it seems that I not only have to be on the offensive with you, but also on the defensive. Arguing about issues makes me uncomfortable, though I seem to like the challenge. Trouble is, I also tend to get a little hot under the collar and a little carried away. Discussing issues, seems to be more of what I am more comfortable with. See you around the forums I will say that I didn't mean to demean volunteers, but I as a relatively young person probably don't understand that older folks simply move around a bit slowly. Believe you me I take my voting very seriously and I thank you again for volunteering. As for arguing - I am blunt and direct, but I try my best not to get personal (not that you get personal). Anyway, thanks again for serving your community. I apologize for having used language that offended you. Have a good night, and good work tomorrow (if you volunteer again)
_____________________________
"We have removed an ally of Al Qaeda" - G.W. Bush lies to America and to the world, 5/1/2003
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|