|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
Ginormous Atom Smasher Goes Online - 9/12/2008 2:50:05 AM
|
|
|
ManimalX
Posts: 1264
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
|
From: http://www.usnews.com/articles/science/space-and-time/2008/09/10/worlds-largest-atom-smasher-goes-online.html quote:
Although often referred to as an atom-smasher, the collider won't actually smash atoms but rather protons—relatively large bits that make up the nucleus of an atom. By shattering protons into shards of barely-matter so infinitesimally small and nearly devoid of mass, scientists hope to generate the postulated Higgs boson, the missing link that spawned something from nothing—matter from galactic goo—in the earliest instants of the Big Bang. Indeed, the cosmic progenitor of Everything. What does this mean for evolutionists? Creationists? I notice throughout this articles and others on the subject many references to "almost" nothing and "nearly" light-speed. Comments?
_____________________________
"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed." - 2nd Peter 3:10
|
|
|
|
RE: Ginormous Atom Smasher Goes Online - 9/12/2008 12:45:38 PM
|
|
|
DanJames
Posts: 679
Joined: 12/13/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ManimalX From: http://www.usnews.com/articles/science/space-and-time/2008/09/10/worlds-largest-atom-smasher-goes-online.html quote:
Although often referred to as an atom-smasher, the collider won't actually smash atoms but rather protons—relatively large bits that make up the nucleus of an atom. By shattering protons into shards of barely-matter so infinitesimally small and nearly devoid of mass, scientists hope to generate the postulated Higgs boson, the missing link that spawned something from nothing—matter from galactic goo—in the earliest instants of the Big Bang. Indeed, the cosmic progenitor of Everything. What does this mean for evolutionists? Creationists? I notice throughout this articles and others on the subject many references to "almost" nothing and "nearly" light-speed. Comments? I can't wait to find out what they discover.
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|